rivendellrose (
rivendellrose) wrote2009-10-12 01:59 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
the stupid burns
Turns out that killing your kid by not getting them treatment for a simple thing like juvenile diabetes is only worth 6 months in prison if you do it for religious reasons.
Because apparently criminal neglect is a-okay if you do it because you thought God would fix it.
Because apparently criminal neglect is a-okay if you do it because you thought God would fix it.
no subject
No, fucko. The "difference" is that of spiritual "treatment" and Western medicine, one would have easily treated the child's illness and the other resulted in her death by negligence.
The "difference" is that, using one of those treatment methods, your clients killed their daughter.
I suspect the short jail sentence is due to a couple factors: making sure their remaining children still have parents, and the likely fact that no prison term could possibly punish them as much as having to live our their lives knowing that their daughter would be alive were it not for their negligence. Not saying I agree with it, but I can see where the reasoning comes from.
(Also, I think you mean "by not getting" in your link...)
no subject
I don't agree with it, though.
no subject
See, I could see that except for the teensy little fact that they don't seem from the article to see that what they did was wrong. They don't have any remorse! I feel guiltier when I accidentally kill a freaking houseplant or when one of my goldfish dies than these people seem to be over their 11 year-old daughter. Disgusting.
(Yeah, thanks - I noticed and fixed it just before I got your reply!)
If a person "genuinely believes" that poisoning their kid will send them to heaven, does this mean that by court precedent it's okay, then? Because it sure as hell looks like it might to me.
no subject
That said, the consequences of getting that one wrong are pretty severe. I just don't know...
no subject
no subject
I do agree with you that CPS can be overzealous, but it can also be neglident at times.
no subject
no subject
no subject