I love elections... *gags*
Oct. 29th, 2004 04:56 pmTrying to fill out my absentee ballot, this evening. The process has been quite interesting, so I thought I'd share some highlights.
Step one: Read descriptions of all initiatives. Get very nervous and confused, decide to do the rest, then research and come back to those later.
Step two: Vote for Kerry/Edwards, and then scan down to wonder why the fuck Nader is trying AGAIN and hope he doesn't steal too many votes.
Step three: Contentedly vote the party line down til Commissioner of Public Lands, then start Googling names to find their campaign sites or newspaper articles or what-have-you, desperate for some sort of insight. Same with Superintendent of Public Instruction. Back to former system on Insurance Commissioner.
Step four: In which university loyalty becomes a factor. Arrive at Justice position #6. Richard B. Sanders graduated from the UW school of law (a point in his favour, to my mind), has the backing of the state bar association, and looks good. Unfortunately, he's backed by the Republican party, which makes me nervous. I look at his opponent, Terry Sebring... He was a WSU graduate. Not only from the eastern side of the state, which is scary, but... our competitor-school. I scan the rest, see that he has nothing else in his bio of interest to me, and vote Sanders.
And, a note to you Seattle folks.... HELP!!! I can't think my way out of all these stupid initiatives, and the online research is making things clear as mud. Any wisdom to offer?
Step one: Read descriptions of all initiatives. Get very nervous and confused, decide to do the rest, then research and come back to those later.
Step two: Vote for Kerry/Edwards, and then scan down to wonder why the fuck Nader is trying AGAIN and hope he doesn't steal too many votes.
Step three: Contentedly vote the party line down til Commissioner of Public Lands, then start Googling names to find their campaign sites or newspaper articles or what-have-you, desperate for some sort of insight. Same with Superintendent of Public Instruction. Back to former system on Insurance Commissioner.
Step four: In which university loyalty becomes a factor. Arrive at Justice position #6. Richard B. Sanders graduated from the UW school of law (a point in his favour, to my mind), has the backing of the state bar association, and looks good. Unfortunately, he's backed by the Republican party, which makes me nervous. I look at his opponent, Terry Sebring... He was a WSU graduate. Not only from the eastern side of the state, which is scary, but... our competitor-school. I scan the rest, see that he has nothing else in his bio of interest to me, and vote Sanders.
And, a note to you Seattle folks.... HELP!!! I can't think my way out of all these stupid initiatives, and the online research is making things clear as mud. Any wisdom to offer?
no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 05:28 pm (UTC)On initiatives...vote no on Eyman (as a matter of principle) and I also voted against the sales tax increase (884, i think it was) because I don't feel that it'll do any good. And PLEASE DEAR GOD VOTE NO ON R-55 (CHARTER SCHOOLS). Charter schools are a bad bad bad thing.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 05:33 pm (UTC)Hmmm, see I got the impression that Billings was looking to add other requirements, not take away the WASL. In which case I'm with her... huh.
Which one is the Eyman? I see a bunch of stuff that has his trademark "where's the money coming from?" problem, but I can't actually tell which one was his.....
no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 05:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 05:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 05:32 pm (UTC)Eyeman can go fuck himself.
The rest I have no idea.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 05:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 05:34 pm (UTC)In particular, you want to vote no on the monorail initiative-- voters have already approved the initiative several times over, and this is just a last-ditch attempt by a small group of property owners to get it turned around-- and you should also vote against substituting slot-machine revenue for property tax revenue. The schools initiative is hard: Washington doesn't exactly need a higher sales tax, but we do need to fund our schools properly. I voted yes on more money for schools.
And I voted against the incumbent Superintendent of Public Instruction, because she seems to have difficulty recognizing that public schools in Washington have problems.
I could go on for a while-- feel free to message or e-mail me if you want to discuss things :)
no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 05:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 05:41 pm (UTC)http://www.secstate.wa.gov/elections/guide/
no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 05:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 06:35 pm (UTC)B
no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 06:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 06:38 pm (UTC)And if you want to know who The Washington State Democrats have endorsed, you can get to the list from here http://www.wa-democrats.org/site/index.php
Hope this helps!
B
no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 07:24 pm (UTC)Governor: Christine Gregoire
Lieutenant Governor: Brad Owen
Secretary of State: Laura Ruderman
State Treasurer: Michael Murphy
State Auditor: Brian Sonntag
State Attorney General: Deborah Senn
Commissioner of Public Lands: Mike Cooper
Superintendent of Public Instruction: Terry Bergeson
Insurance Commissioner: Mike Kreidler
State Supreme Court Pos. 1: Mary Kay Becker
State Supreme Court Pos. 6: Terry Sebring
YES on Iniative 297 (regulating hazardous waste)
NO on Initiative 872 (limiting voter’s choices)
YES on Intiative 884 (creating an education fund)
NO on Initiative 892 (extending gambling)
NO on Referendum 55 (charter schools)
no subject
Date: 2004-10-30 12:09 am (UTC)http://www.thestranger.com/specials/Election_Cheat_Sheet_2004.pdf
I pretty much endorse all their choices.
Chris
no subject
Date: 2004-11-01 06:25 am (UTC)