oh for crying out loud
Aug. 14th, 2009 01:27 pmTulsa, Oklahoma, mayoral candidate wants to put a creationist exhibit in the Tulsa Zoo.
There's some background to this, for me. Yesterday, I received a plea for money from the Secular Coalition for America, of which I am a member. I thought "well, maybe," because, let's be honest - I have a trip to Asia coming up, my tuition for the Museum Studies thing still needs to be sent in, and there are a lot of other charities that could use my money, particularly since my county is working on a serious budget shortfall this year, and I'd like to do what little I can to help out with that.
And then this showed up in my morning link-feed. A quote, for those of you who don't feel like reading the whole insane article:
"Today we are announcing that God will be glorified in this city. He shall not be shunned. Upon our election, we hereby commit to honoring Him in all ways that He has been dishonored," said Anna Falling.
Thanks, you flipping idiot. I needed a reminder of exactly what kind of wack-jobs the Secular Coalition exists to fight. They are officially the winner of my charity money this month.
In other WTF news, apparently 50% of Americans think it should be legally required for women to change their name to their husband's last name when they marry. They can get right on the "out of my country, you freaking psychopaths" wagon along with the afore-mentioned Tulsa politician and all the idiots who actually listen to anything Sarah Palin says.
It comes to my attention that I stupidly thought electing Obama meant that Americans were getting less stupid. This is clearly not the case.
But wait! There's more stupid out there!: Apparently some moron named John C. Wright (apparently a sci-fi author? I've never heard of him...) is upset that the Sci-Fi Channel is going to be including more homosexual characters in their shows. So upset, in fact, that he's coined a new word - "homosex."
Have a rage-inducing quote: Someone explain to me by what series of events persons with serious sexual-psychological malfunctions would somehow be awarded the status of moral arbiters, something like priests and confessors and sages -- except that the passkey to being a guardian of public conscience in our age is the absence of moral value, not the presence.
Fuck you, too, Mr Wright. I have never heard of you before today, but you can bet that I will be avoiding your books in the future, and working as hard as I can to convince everyone else I know to do so as well. Bigoted idiot.
* * *
Religion fail, sexism fail, and now homophobia fail, too - look, everybody, I've got a full house! *Seethes* I'm going to go read www.givesmehope.com for the rest of my lunch break, and try to remember that there's parts of the human race that are actually still worthwhile.
There's some background to this, for me. Yesterday, I received a plea for money from the Secular Coalition for America, of which I am a member. I thought "well, maybe," because, let's be honest - I have a trip to Asia coming up, my tuition for the Museum Studies thing still needs to be sent in, and there are a lot of other charities that could use my money, particularly since my county is working on a serious budget shortfall this year, and I'd like to do what little I can to help out with that.
And then this showed up in my morning link-feed. A quote, for those of you who don't feel like reading the whole insane article:
"Today we are announcing that God will be glorified in this city. He shall not be shunned. Upon our election, we hereby commit to honoring Him in all ways that He has been dishonored," said Anna Falling.
Thanks, you flipping idiot. I needed a reminder of exactly what kind of wack-jobs the Secular Coalition exists to fight. They are officially the winner of my charity money this month.
In other WTF news, apparently 50% of Americans think it should be legally required for women to change their name to their husband's last name when they marry. They can get right on the "out of my country, you freaking psychopaths" wagon along with the afore-mentioned Tulsa politician and all the idiots who actually listen to anything Sarah Palin says.
It comes to my attention that I stupidly thought electing Obama meant that Americans were getting less stupid. This is clearly not the case.
But wait! There's more stupid out there!: Apparently some moron named John C. Wright (apparently a sci-fi author? I've never heard of him...) is upset that the Sci-Fi Channel is going to be including more homosexual characters in their shows. So upset, in fact, that he's coined a new word - "homosex."
Have a rage-inducing quote: Someone explain to me by what series of events persons with serious sexual-psychological malfunctions would somehow be awarded the status of moral arbiters, something like priests and confessors and sages -- except that the passkey to being a guardian of public conscience in our age is the absence of moral value, not the presence.
Fuck you, too, Mr Wright. I have never heard of you before today, but you can bet that I will be avoiding your books in the future, and working as hard as I can to convince everyone else I know to do so as well. Bigoted idiot.
* * *
Religion fail, sexism fail, and now homophobia fail, too - look, everybody, I've got a full house! *Seethes* I'm going to go read www.givesmehope.com for the rest of my lunch break, and try to remember that there's parts of the human race that are actually still worthwhile.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-14 08:40 pm (UTC)her: "Not really."
me: "Ok"
I was raised with the name change thing and though it was a big deal till the actual time came then it was like whatever.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-14 08:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-14 09:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-14 09:11 pm (UTC)(Sorry to have co-opted your angry post, Jen!)
no subject
Date: 2009-08-15 03:17 am (UTC)And for the record, I think the hyphenation would be really fun with your names.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-14 08:58 pm (UTC)My dad wants me to change my last name, M would kind of like me to, but understands why I'd like to keep my own.
I'll take both!
no subject
Date: 2009-08-14 09:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-14 09:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-15 03:23 am (UTC)But it is so not an issue for any kind of legislation. Dear god, I just don't know what people are thinking sometimes...
no subject
Date: 2009-08-15 03:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-14 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-14 10:32 pm (UTC)Incidentally,
Quite a pair, these two.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-14 11:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-15 03:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-15 12:17 am (UTC)Of course, I wouldn't mind if they weren't otherwise obviously skeezy beyond belief.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-15 12:36 am (UTC)I pity their kids.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-15 03:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-15 03:50 am (UTC)That's right. They named a kid Justinian.
And another kid Orville.
*winces*
And oh yeah - these clueless racist fools are, if
*shudders*
no subject
Date: 2009-08-14 08:56 pm (UTC)So, on a vaguely related note, this woman calls me at work to tell me the reason she hasn't paid her bill is that the reminder came to her house with her maiden name on the address, so she didn't know who it was for.
Hang on for a sec, a letter came to your house, with addressed to someone with your first name and what was until a fortnight ago your surname and you didn't know it was for you. Tell me, are you a moron?
Yeah, I'll file that one under Never Gonna Fly.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-14 09:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-15 12:19 am (UTC)/sarcasm
Seriously, I'm appalled by the kind of crap people will try to pull. It just boggles the mind.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-14 09:19 pm (UTC)I appended my husband's last name onto mine when I got married, no hyphen; I actually did it legally, which most people never do, but I figured I needed a legal name of permanency for my occupation. Of course, then when I got my green card it wasn't on my passport yet so I actually have a different legal name in the US and in Canada, and my health card right now only has my maiden name, and and - if I had to do it all over, I would just keep my maiden name, none of his, argh (though I don't mind using it socially; I tend to abbreviate just to first name + his last name socially and especially on the telephone, for ease of reference).
no subject
Date: 2009-08-15 03:27 am (UTC)Yeah, I can see how that could be a total mess. I'm not sure what I'd do if the situation came up, but I think whatever people decide based on what matters to them is totally cool - I'm just very against anyone trying to legislate on this or telling other people what they should be doing, because, um, personal decision? Yeah. :P
no subject
Date: 2009-08-14 09:20 pm (UTC)Man: So when are you going to change your name?
Woman: What? I'm not. Do you want to change your name to mine?
Man: No... I've had my name my whole life.
Woman: Yes?
Man: Oh.
LOL, so great.
I figure with all the stupid running around, and how it actually seems to have gotten worse, what with the irrational Obamaphobia, I have to gear down and buy my own little private island somewhere and only the people that can string two rational thoughts together will be allow on it. I'm scared for the future. Seriously.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-14 09:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-14 09:55 pm (UTC)In all seriousness - would you prefer if I filtered for politics? I know a lot of people do, I just hadn't decided if it was necessary yet.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-14 10:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-15 03:34 am (UTC)I can see what you mean about it looking very odd, but I have to say - that's also kind of adorable. ♥
Totally with you on the fear. I feel like... so, I must have been totally nuts back in November, but I genuinely thought that Obama winning would mean people would get less crazy. That the conservatives would settle down a little and realize they can't have everything their fricking way. Instead, it's like they've all turned into temper-tantrum-throwing three year-olds who've had their toys taken away, and they just can't stop proving that there's always a lower, stupider, more asinine place that they're willing to go to. :P
no subject
Date: 2009-08-14 09:27 pm (UTC)In all seriousness, though, I had to comment to say -- I'd never seen givesmehope.com before. Thanks much for that.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-15 03:37 am (UTC)And yay, I'm glad you liked it! It's an awesome site. &heart;
BTW, now that it's literally months since the last time we talked about it, did you still want to meet up for tea sometime? My schedule's fairly open this month and next, and then it all goes to hell again for a while in October, when I start my certification program.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-20 11:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-14 11:04 pm (UTC)GAH.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-14 11:25 pm (UTC)I mean, don't get me wrong, the anti-gay vitriol pisses me off too - but random and illogical insistence on polarization where none exists just really pushes buttons for me - as if all people not only should, but do, fit into tidy little boxes. And they must be the mortal enemies of the folks in the differently-shaped little boxes, because, well . . because?
And obviously people wishing to display integrity in all aspects of their lives without facing discrimination for it is a greater threat to the overall moral fiber of our nation than is the acceptance and furtherance of inflammatory rhetoric that uses neither logic nor fact to support itself and discourages its audience from rational thought and reasonable discourse while encouraging them to demonize anyone who disagrees with them or lives differently than they do. Because obviously, the former is so much more likely to result in social isolation and fear and violence and the general degeneration of a functional culture. Forthrightness bad. Sewing discord good.
[Please note sarcasm]
Mr Wright can officially kiss my working-class, pro-gay-rights, feminist, pro-life, pagan, pro-2nd-Amendment, pro-environment, shops-at-Walmart-and-at-Whole-Foods, registered-Independent-and-yes-I-vote-thank-you-very-fucking-much ass.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-14 11:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-15 12:41 am (UTC)That's right. No majors. No texts written after the 1930s. Almost no texts by non-Europeans. Virtually nothing by women. Nothing by uncloseted gays. No science more current than Darwin. For four whole years.
Some very bright, creative people go to St. John's, but some incredibly arrogant fuckheads with no marketable skills save slinging bullshit pass through its hallowed halls as well. Mr. Wright and his
trophy wifespouse seem to be firmly in the latter camp.*so glad I went to Smith*
no subject
Date: 2009-08-15 03:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-14 11:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-15 03:39 am (UTC)1. Crazy lady wants creationism at zoos, because... um... because God made animals? I don't entirely understand this, since I sure as hell have never seen significant amounts of information on evolution at the zoo... but maybe Tulsa is different?
2. Morons think women should have to take their husbands names. No idea why this matters so much to them.
3. Even bigger moron is convinced that the Sci-Fi channel is part of some kind of crazy Gay Agenda conspiracy. I can only hope that he accidentally watches Torchwood and his brain explodes.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-15 06:53 am (UTC)I always try to see the best in people, but some people just literally scare the hell out of me.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-14 11:54 pm (UTC)However, I don't think there needs to be a law about it. People should be able to call themselves whatever they want, as long as it isn't aliases to avoid the law or something.
Did you see the Metaquote in response to Wright? It, and some of the comments, might make you feel better.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-14 11:59 pm (UTC)People should be able to call themselves whatever they want, as long as it isn't aliases to avoid the law or something.
Exactly. No problem at all.
And thank you - I think I shall need that when I finish wading through all the horribleness of all of this!
no subject
Date: 2009-08-15 01:53 am (UTC)'At the age of 42, Wright converted from atheism to Christianity. In 2008 he converted to the Roman Catholic Church of which he approvingly stated "If Vulcans had a church, they'd be Catholics."'
That's a poor excuse for a Trekkie right there. Now if you'll excuse me, Mr. Spock and I will be in the corner getting drunk on single-malt.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-15 02:39 am (UTC)Okay. I can kind of see that he might be basing that on the rituals we see in canon (such as in "Amok Time") - there's a vague sort of similarity there, I guess? But from a standpoint of actual belief system, um... wtf?
And anyway, what the hell should that matter in the choice of someone's religious beliefs? o_O
no subject
Date: 2009-08-15 02:24 pm (UTC)Not sure if that was directed at me (for being intolerant in the face of intolerance) or him (for making a seemingly arbitrary decision of religions based on which one would be followed by a fictitious race of logical aliens), but then again, it could go both ways.
I was raised Catholic, though I don't consider myself one now, and frankly the only thing that I see in Vulcans that reminds me of Catholics in general, drawing from the ones I know and have known personally, is the intolerance towards other people and other ideas as displayed in "Amok Time" (and to a far greater extent, in "Enterprise," although I don't know if Mr. Wright would have watched that).
But from a canonical standpoint, the idea of Vulcans even having a religion doesn't work. Vulcans eat, breathe, and live logic. They like facts, and evidence. What use would they have for any type of religious or faith-based system, faith being defined as the ability to believe what cannot be proven?
(I'm done now, I swear, but this has been bugging me all night... Time to get out of the house, I think.)
no subject
Date: 2009-08-15 05:27 pm (UTC)That said, you're not wrong about the intolerance displayed by Vulcans... but, to be fair, in my experience here on the West coast, I've always seen Catholics as one of the more moderate Christian groups. I know that's not at all true on the East coast or in other areas, but it does somewhat color my view of the faith in a vaguely affectionate way, in that most Catholics in my area tend to be pretty liberal.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-15 10:02 pm (UTC)There's a suspicious stick-and-carrot mentality about his choice of words. The way it was phrased, it seemed to be implying that geeky/nerdy people would be more interested in a system of faith if they could see one of their favorite scifi characters participating in that system. But if Mr. Wright is going that route, it further implies that people who are interested and invested in science fiction and fantasy are all godless heathens who need to be duped into joining a church. Which would be very funny to my friend Nathan, who is a practicing youth minister and writes scifi on the side.
And I envy you your experience of West Coast Catholics. I have relatives here in New York who've pulled their kids out of Catholic Sunday school because the teachings were too intolerant.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-15 03:48 am (UTC)