(no subject)
Mar. 24th, 2010 02:30 pmSo, I have to say that despite my love of the three previous movies (see icon, from the day
maymargaret and I dressed up in Pirate costumes to see the second movie) I have absolutely zero interest in this fourth movie that they're making to try to squeeze more money out of continue the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise. So... chalk that up to a previous bias. I can just only take so much crass commercialism and "OMG MAKE MORE!!!" before I get sick to my stomach and swear off whatever thing is dancing around doing the consumer-whore polka. But... I don't even know what to make of this.
Disney says no to fake boobs in 4th Pirates movie.
Um. What?
For one, I'm slightly worried that we're going to apparently be seeing enough of someone's boobs (presumably more than one person, even!) that we need to worry about this. There's some comment in here about diving and swimming... okay, fine, but that much? Aren't diving stunts usually handled by stunt people, to begin with?
And then there's the moral issue. I'm all for encouraging movies back toward not demanding the sort of unnatural ultra-skinny faux-boobs faux-tan botox-faced Photoshopped plastic actresses who seem to be all that we see on TV and movies these days. Yayyy, that's a good thing. But, um, I don't think you can legitimately get that by making casting calls even more a meat market for women's bodies.
All I can say is that I'd really like to see a movie try to cast men for naturally big wangs and see how far it gets them. "Oh, I'm sorry, no stuffing! We're going to have to search you all to make sure there aren't any implants, falsies, or pairs of socks shoved down your speedos!"
Just picture that for a moment. Feel free to include whichever of your favorite actors you like, while you're at it. I'm sure that's what the casting directors at Disney are doing with the actresses, after all.
Disney says no to fake boobs in 4th Pirates movie.
Um. What?
For one, I'm slightly worried that we're going to apparently be seeing enough of someone's boobs (presumably more than one person, even!) that we need to worry about this. There's some comment in here about diving and swimming... okay, fine, but that much? Aren't diving stunts usually handled by stunt people, to begin with?
And then there's the moral issue. I'm all for encouraging movies back toward not demanding the sort of unnatural ultra-skinny faux-boobs faux-tan botox-faced Photoshopped plastic actresses who seem to be all that we see on TV and movies these days. Yayyy, that's a good thing. But, um, I don't think you can legitimately get that by making casting calls even more a meat market for women's bodies.
All I can say is that I'd really like to see a movie try to cast men for naturally big wangs and see how far it gets them. "Oh, I'm sorry, no stuffing! We're going to have to search you all to make sure there aren't any implants, falsies, or pairs of socks shoved down your speedos!"
Just picture that for a moment. Feel free to include whichever of your favorite actors you like, while you're at it. I'm sure that's what the casting directors at Disney are doing with the actresses, after all.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 09:57 pm (UTC)That said, I am so over this franchise. Unless I see word of something truly unexpected out of this one, I don't anticipate seeing it.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 10:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 11:05 pm (UTC)(I was kind of terribly exasperated to hear they were continuing on with the series - I adored the first three in all their pulpy incoherent goodness and thought the narrative should have been left there - but since they've cast Ian McShane and Penelope Cruz I find myself quite looking forward to seeing at least what direction they're taking the movies.)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 11:19 pm (UTC)I'm a bit "meh" about Penelope Cruz (...honestly, I can't recall actually seeing her in anything, even though I'm sure I have), don't know anything about Ian McShane, but... I don't know. We'll just have to see, I guess.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 11:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-25 02:10 am (UTC)