![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Harold Camping, the twit who has been (once again) predicting the end of the world, this time for the 21st of this month (aka "tomorrow"), has finally figured out that if, as he originally said, the end days would begin at 6pm local time in each time zone starting on the west coast... that would mean it wouldn't get to most of the world until the 22nd. Oops!
But don't worry. He's figured it out now. The end of the world actually starts tonight!
Which is fine with me, as I always like to have a bit of a party during a supposed apocalypse, and we already had plans to go out with one of The Boy's friends and his wife this evening. Copper River salmon, here I come. ♥
And before anyone asks (not that I really think anyone would, but you never know...); no, I don't think the world will end tonight. Although I am starting to suspect that the beautiful sun Seattle has had the last few days is leaving us, and it may even rain. Which would suck, as I'm wearing a sundress and very non-waterproof flats. I don't believe the world will end in one big go, I don't believe in the rapture (although if I did, I would harbor a distinct suspicion that most of the people with "In case of Rapture, this car will be un-manned" bumper stickers will be stickin' it out with us heathens, because...), I don't believe in pretending to know the mind of God. If you believe in a god, that's just plain arrogant. And, for my money, not very smart - the universe loves to make people look stupid after they've made a big public statement of certainty.
But don't worry. He's figured it out now. The end of the world actually starts tonight!
Which is fine with me, as I always like to have a bit of a party during a supposed apocalypse, and we already had plans to go out with one of The Boy's friends and his wife this evening. Copper River salmon, here I come. ♥
And before anyone asks (not that I really think anyone would, but you never know...); no, I don't think the world will end tonight. Although I am starting to suspect that the beautiful sun Seattle has had the last few days is leaving us, and it may even rain. Which would suck, as I'm wearing a sundress and very non-waterproof flats. I don't believe the world will end in one big go, I don't believe in the rapture (although if I did, I would harbor a distinct suspicion that most of the people with "In case of Rapture, this car will be un-manned" bumper stickers will be stickin' it out with us heathens, because...), I don't believe in pretending to know the mind of God. If you believe in a god, that's just plain arrogant. And, for my money, not very smart - the universe loves to make people look stupid after they've made a big public statement of certainty.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 10:01 pm (UTC)I'm living large - didn't clean my bathrooms this week and might not take my books back to the library on time. Woo hoo!!
no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 10:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 10:20 pm (UTC)Yeah. That. IMO ( . . but just IMO, let me emphasize, at the risk of sounding like an utter hypocrite) one of the most important things to remember, no matter what you believe, is that you should never do something that would be heinous should you happen to be wrong. I can't swear that when you see the color red, and I see the color red, that we're seeing anything that looks even remotely similar . . let alone that I understand how *God* sees things. . . which doesn't mean one shouldn't try. It just means that one should allow for the fact that everyone else is trying too, and you're not all going to get the same answers. Not moral relativism . . just humility.
. . . what that had to do with the apocalypse or its lack, I'm not sure, but it related to your comment.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 10:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 10:25 pm (UTC)However, I heard that only the people who listen to the dude's radio program/believe only what HE says will be raptured. So the world's still gonna be quite full after the weekend.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 10:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 10:29 pm (UTC)...Seriously? Who does this guy think he is, talking like that?!
no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 10:30 pm (UTC)Lol. That's a fantastic response, yes!
Not moral relativism . . just humility.
This is so totally true. I mean, I don't know, hell, maybe the world is going to end... but I seriously doubt it, and I'm not inclined to believe anybody who, to me, looks so hideously arrogant and, frankly, blasphemous.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 10:37 pm (UTC)Also, 'the end of the world' is kinda relative . . . except those folks who are crying about the large hadron collider . . they were expecting a real an inarguable End of The World. I mean, it's hard to argue with a black hole (and I accidentally read a fic the other day that warned for 'apocalypse', and I didn't realize quite how properly the author was using the word, as it gets thrown around a lot . . seriously, seriously freaked me out). But . . . climate change? Zombies? Portal to hell? Alien invasion?
. . . ask the Romans about that sort of apocalypse. Take a long view of history, and the world - the world as we know it - ends all the damned time.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 10:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 10:44 pm (UTC). . . ask the Romans about that sort of apocalypse. Take a long view of history, and the world - the world as we know it - ends all the damned time.
Hee, precisely. I figure "the world as we know it" is ending every day. The world today sure as heck isn't the same one my grandparents grew up with, or that my parents grew up with, or even that I grew up with. That's life. The world moves on.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 10:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 10:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 10:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 10:57 pm (UTC)That's the thing that pisses me off the most about this kind of charlatanism. I mean, yeah, you and I and many of our friends are having a good laugh at the stupid, but there are people who take this shit seriously, people who have quit their jobs and sold off all their possessions because they genuinely believe this man speaks the truth. Worse, a friend who works in animal rescue reported yesterday that they've been called in to save a fair number of pets from owners who were planning on killing them rather than leave them homeless once the Rapture comes.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 11:01 pm (UTC)Oh, fuck that. I do genuinely feel terrible about the people who are quitting their jobs and clearing out their bank accounts and all that, but it is... unacceptable beyond thought to me, to think of people that deluded and callous. And I realize they don't think it's callous, but for god's sake, you do not kill your pets, ever. They're innocent. They're the ones a just god would be saving, you freaking morons.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 11:34 pm (UTC)(FWIW, when I was in high school and my Bible Study started on the Book of Revelation, that was the moment, I think now in retrospect, though I wasn't aware of it at the time, that I began my journey towards atheism. Because shit does none of that make sense.)
no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 11:40 pm (UTC)I've been trying to figure that out, too - it's been all over NPR the last few weeks. I have a theory about why they're covering it, at least - they've been referring to the troubles, people leaving their jobs and draining their bank accounts, and also to the fact that Camping has predicted the end of the world before, with no effect. So I think they're trying to make a big deal out of it so that he has a slightly harder time sweeping it under the rug when the sun shines bright on Sunday morning, you know?
I hope that's what it is. Because otherwise it's just "quick, distract everyone from the real problems in the world with a fun story about crazies," which, no thanks.
Because shit does none of that make sense.
I remember hearing a really interesting theory that Revelations (...from what I can remember, and I admit that I cannot recall the source of this, so grain of salt is required) is actually an allegory calling out (essentially threatening) the end of the Roman empire. Which delights me, because that makes sense in the context of early Christianity, them thumbing their noses at the empire in a covert fashion.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 11:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 11:45 pm (UTC)I also recall hearing this theory--I think it was in my Bible as Lit class in college. And it made me very happy! Because it means that the end of the world already happened, centuries ago! And now the entire species is living in a post-apocalyptic world that does not involve Thunderdome in any way.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 11:47 pm (UTC)Go family values!
no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 11:49 pm (UTC)And I don't think in either time that Jesus meant you should tell your kids they're going to hell if they don't believe the same random little nuances that you do. Somehow, I just doubt it.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 11:58 pm (UTC)That's pretty much the interpretation I've come to when it comes to Revelation. At the time, learning about it with a youth minister who preached the Bible as being one hundred percent truth and no metaphor or allegory (which...I sometimes wonder how this dude ever managed to read the Bible, because seriously), I was just like, No. I cannot accept this. This makes no sense and I don't want this to be the way I look at the world. I mean, I didn't think of it quite so rationally, that was more subconscious, but yeah. Six years later and I was out!
no subject
Date: 2011-05-21 12:06 am (UTC)I never know what to think with that sort of thing. Some of them certainly seem to be, but I often find that when I assume these sorts of things are all just people who have legitimate issues, there turn out to be people who seem to have nothing wrong with them at all. They just... got sucked into something.
This makes no sense and I don't want this to be the way I look at the world.
Same, if that could be translated into small-child logic. I wasn't really raised with religion, though - church was always a faintly odd thing that friends' families did and that I occasionally got dragged along on, much to my confusion. My mother swears she took me to Sunday school a few times when I was little, and I tended to just loudly and cluelessly ask where the dinosaurs fit in and things like that. I do distinctly remember arguing with someone at probably a friend's church about how the thing with Jonah couldn't possibly be true because whales don't eat people. I was very indignant.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-21 12:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-21 12:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-21 12:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-21 12:43 am (UTC)What scares me is the potential this has for turning into another Jonestown-type thing, with someone deciding that the way to bring about the Rapture is by killing themselves and their families like that that group that committed mass suicide when the Hale-Bopp comet came 'round in the 90s. Or that believing parents will murder their non-believing children because, like the true believing pet owners, they think it would be a mercy.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-21 12:47 am (UTC)There's a lot of doomsday cults all the time who don't go offing themselves or anyone else. I hope this one turns out to be one of those.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-22 12:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-22 08:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-22 10:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-23 09:41 pm (UTC)*sigh* Any qualifiers to go with that, or do you think the scientists and social workers who believe in a god are arrogant and stupid, too?
no subject
Date: 2011-05-23 09:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-23 09:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-23 09:54 pm (UTC)Direct quote from the above post:
I don't believe in pretending to know the mind of God. If you believe in a god, that's just plain arrogant.
I stand by that statement.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-23 11:24 pm (UTC)I read it as two completely separate statements:
"I don't believe in pretending to know the mind of God. If you believe in a god, that [[believing in a god]] is just plain arrogant."
After re-reading, what I presume you meant was:
"I don't believe in pretending to know the mind of God. If you believe in a god, that [[pretending to know the mind of God]] is just plain arrogant."