*headdesk*
Mar. 8th, 2005 10:27 amI solemnly swear that I will never again return a set of DVDs in which I have avid interest (particularly a set that cost me $11.something to rent from Scarecrow) without fucking double- and triple-checking to make sure that I have seen every second of potentially important extra footage on the damned disks. If my computer decides that she hates the interviews, I will move upstairs and muck my way through using the PS2 controller to navigate. If that fails, I will sit there patiently until one of my housemates comes home, and then beg them to do it for me.
Why?
THIS is why. Because damn it, the final, edited ending sucked compared to what they apparently originally had to work with, and their editors are assholes for not sticking with it as originally planned. Grrrrr.
I'm glad there are people out there who are smarter with DVDs than I am, that's all I can say.
Also, I'm amused that everyone has their own theory of what the cover of HBP indicates - I've so far heard that Dumbledore is dead (which I thought all the way back in OotP), and that Snape is dead (more sensible, in my opinion, because of the Potions text. I, however, believe that this vindicates my theory on the identity of the half-blood prince: it's so Snape, folks. I'm telling you, he's the long-lost grand-son of Rasputin and the last czarina of Russia. It all makes sense, now, doesn't it?
Oh, come on. Just humour me. ;)
Right. Working on paper, now.
And Happy International Women's Day!!!
ETA: Okay, I get the confusion, now. See, there's the normal cover and there's also the British 'adult' cover. So what does this tell me? Well, obviously, the pensieve will be important. And potions. And Dumbledore. And possibly Snape. I'm siding with the folks who suggest that Snape dies in this one, even though by story!logic, it's time for good ole Dumbledore to kick it... because just by saying that, I will probably ensure that no, she'll kill Dumbledore. Just to 'spite' me. So there!
Why?
THIS is why. Because damn it, the final, edited ending sucked compared to what they apparently originally had to work with, and their editors are assholes for not sticking with it as originally planned. Grrrrr.
I'm glad there are people out there who are smarter with DVDs than I am, that's all I can say.
Also, I'm amused that everyone has their own theory of what the cover of HBP indicates - I've so far heard that Dumbledore is dead (which I thought all the way back in OotP), and that Snape is dead (more sensible, in my opinion, because of the Potions text. I, however, believe that this vindicates my theory on the identity of the half-blood prince: it's so Snape, folks. I'm telling you, he's the long-lost grand-son of Rasputin and the last czarina of Russia. It all makes sense, now, doesn't it?
Oh, come on. Just humour me. ;)
Right. Working on paper, now.
And Happy International Women's Day!!!
ETA: Okay, I get the confusion, now. See, there's the normal cover and there's also the British 'adult' cover. So what does this tell me? Well, obviously, the pensieve will be important. And potions. And Dumbledore. And possibly Snape. I'm siding with the folks who suggest that Snape dies in this one, even though by story!logic, it's time for good ole Dumbledore to kick it... because just by saying that, I will probably ensure that no, she'll kill Dumbledore. Just to 'spite' me. So there!
no subject
Date: 2005-03-08 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-08 07:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-08 08:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-08 08:44 pm (UTC)...Well, okay, Alan Rickman is probably part of the reason. But the other part was "Snape's Worst Memory." I could nver hate the guy after reading that. It doesn't excuse the bastard he is, but it sure as hell makes me understand him, and I can't resist loving him.
I should just have a t-shirt made, honestly - "I Fall for Reformed Evil." ...But only in fiction, thank the gods.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-08 10:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-09 01:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-09 02:17 am (UTC)What was the other one?
I'm sure you already saw that Mt. St. Helens erupted just a little bit ago. Not a huge one, but exciting all the same.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-09 02:19 am (UTC)what the heck is wrong with lj again? read only, read only argghh!
no subject
Date: 2005-03-09 03:24 am (UTC)I think the "potion" is a pensieve - there's links to both covers up in the entry, so you can see them if you want.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-09 03:58 am (UTC)Definately would lead you to believe that Snape is the Half-Blood Prince, eh?
no subject
Date: 2005-03-09 04:04 am (UTC)*Snickers* Not really - I'm pretty sure it's going to be a new character we haven't met before. I just like to make jokes about the whole "grand-son of Rasputin and the last czarina" thing. ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-03-09 05:33 am (UTC)Doesn't seem THAT far fetched to me.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-09 06:09 am (UTC)More than anything, Rowling has a tendency to make up new characters for each book rather than really developing the characters she has. Like randomly creating Luna in book 5, when she could just as easily have developed one of the previously-mentioned female characters into someone actually worth looking at. But no, she had to make up a totally new thing.
Of course, I could be completely wrong on this one. I'd be happy to be, in fact, in this case.