rivendellrose: (Default)
[personal profile] rivendellrose
I never thought I would say this.

J.K. Rowling has said something worth linking to. Something not directly related to the HP books, and which I actually agree with and feel the need to applaud, despite regarding it as something of a case of 'too little too late,' given her generally less than stellar treatment of female characters in recent books.

Color me shocked - so she's not completely oblivious to feminist issues, just incapable of writing them very well. Go figure.

Gacked off [livejournal.com profile] feminist.

Date: 2006-04-05 04:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lovelies.livejournal.com
I first saw that on [livejournal.com profile] ohnotheydidnt, of all places, and it really is deserving of a bagful of Word.

Date: 2006-04-05 04:38 pm (UTC)
ext_18428: (water pistol)
From: [identity profile] rivendellrose.livejournal.com
So that community is useful for more than the occasional link to nude pics of hot men. Who'd have thought? I'm just learning things all over the place today. ;)

And yes. I hope this gets out to more than just the twenty-some-odd and older fans who already agree with her on the subject.

Date: 2006-04-05 09:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sigelphoenix.livejournal.com
Yes, definitely worth reading, and applauding! Thanks for the link, because I haven't been reading [livejournal.com profile] feminist lately (been avoiding the headache) and I might have missed it.

Date: 2006-04-05 09:30 pm (UTC)
ext_18428: (Default)
From: [identity profile] rivendellrose.livejournal.com
No problem! I get what you mean about avoiding the comm - I just kind of skim, and look into only what looks interesting and non-wanky. ;)

Date: 2006-04-05 09:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theladyfeylene.livejournal.com
I'm torn. On one hand, it is a good message. On the other hand... she has a habit of using fatness in her books to exemplify negative characters and to emphasize negative traits.

Date: 2006-04-05 09:32 pm (UTC)
ext_18428: (dance)
From: [identity profile] rivendellrose.livejournal.com
I know. Myrtle, Umbridge, Marge... Rowling being a hypocrite is nothing new to any of us who pay attention. But I'm not about to gripe about her writing something like this, since a lot of teenage girls might actually notice it.

Doesn't stop me from bitching about the way she portrays women, mind you. But I'm not going to complain about it when she gets something right for a change.

Date: 2006-04-07 01:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miss-arel.livejournal.com
But let's not forget she also has lots of chubby or fat positive characters (Molly Weasley, Hagrid and Neville... plus the Weasley twins are described as 'stocky' and I always imagined Madame Maxime as a big girl all over). And her thin unpleasant characters (the Malfoys, Rita Skeeter, Bellatrix, Petunia, and Voldemort, to name a few.) It's just that when an unpleasant character is fat, she uses much less pleasant terms -- 'fat' and 'porky' as opposed to 'plump', for instance. The same can be said for the thin characters; some of them are described as looking downright unhealthy, like Snape. So I think her characters have a whole range of body types, and yes, some of the bad guys are fat; but a lot of them aren't. So I don't really see it as that hypocritical, really.

Wow, that was long. XD

*sees your pink Winry and raises you another pink-haired cutie*

Date: 2006-04-06 12:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] narsilion.livejournal.com
I read that this morning on "the other site".

Date: 2006-04-06 04:55 pm (UTC)
ext_18428: (Happy!Four-Romana)
From: [identity profile] rivendellrose.livejournal.com
I thought you might've, after what [livejournal.com profile] lovelies said. It's definitely a new side to her.

Profile

rivendellrose: (Default)
rivendellrose

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 9th, 2026 08:12 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios