more on "expelled"
Apr. 11th, 2008 02:39 pmUpdate on the whole "Expelled" fiasco...
waywardcats linked this article over on
anthropologist, and it offers some really great refutations of the idea that "Expelled" is speaking for all scientists who also have some sort of faith. I'm very pleased to see this argument brought up, because it's very true that there are plenty of good, well-known scientists who believe both in religion and in evolution. They don't have to be mutually exclusive - that's just a dichotomy that the proponents of Intelligent Design like to play because it helps their cause.
And if my phone rings one more time while I'm on my lunch break, I'm going to scream. People get to pester me all they want while I'm on the clock, but NOT on my lunch break, darn it!
And if my phone rings one more time while I'm on my lunch break, I'm going to scream. People get to pester me all they want while I'm on the clock, but NOT on my lunch break, darn it!
no subject
Date: 2008-04-11 10:41 pm (UTC)Oh, that is such crap. They're right, Miller wasn't included because he doesn't fit into their tidy little boxes.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-11 10:46 pm (UTC)These morons have screwed up at every turn in the making of this stupid "documentary." I'm seriously starting to wonder if at any point in the creation of the film they've said a single thing that's actually true. Except, of course, that they don't believe in evolution. That, at least, is true... but also hellishly sad.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-11 10:57 pm (UTC)Oh, the Catholic fundies. I think we actually have two types now. There are the charismatic Catholics, who are more like evangelicals (and, I'm sorry, shouting and random outbursts during Mass, I'm not cool with that) and then we have the rad trads, who are waaaaaay on the other side (ie, the people who are really pissed off about Vatican II. The level of pissed-off-ness does vary, though. Not all of them went to the trouble to elect a new pope.)
no subject
Date: 2008-04-14 02:53 am (UTC)I have to say, the only Catholic service I've been to recently (several years ago, admittedly) was ...well, to be honest, it felt exactly like a standard Protestant service, except with added standing. It was at a student center, so maybe that wasn't the most broadly indicative service I could have chosen, but... it unnerved me. I really wouldn't have expected guitars and electric keyboards at a Mass. Am I right in thinking that kind of thing is a recent development... and perhaps a bit unusual?
no subject
Date: 2008-04-12 06:58 am (UTC)Oh, gee.
It's so different here. We assume all scientists are Christian unless they've made a point of telling us otherwise (which is another set of problems in itself). There are many closetet secularists in my faculty, but the fundamentalists stay in the cupboard too. You just wouldn't bring your personal views on religion onto the public arena.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-14 02:49 am (UTC)It's funny you say that, because a lot of the literature on religion versus science or atheism indicates that Europe is vastly more secular than the US. It sounds like what you're talking about is a sense of keeping everything more intensely under the covers, whether religion or any other personal belief... and I have to say that idea sort of appeals to me. As much as I love the American philosophy that we should be able to "be ourselves no matter what," it certainly feels like most people take it out the other end, making their personal issues (whatever those may be) into a public issue.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-14 08:01 am (UTC)There are naturally a lot of different kinds of takes on religion here, enough have fought many a war over them. But I think the thing to keep in mind is that religion has been integrated into society for a very long time. It's had to survive revolutions of many kinds; political, scientific, religious. Because it is a part of society it can't stand in front of science, technology, the progress of modern society, so it's had to find other ways of existing, accommodating to the views of the moderate majority.
You could say that society is more secular. But there are also religious traditions that most people venerate, deeply connected to the very culture of Europe, and the institutions of any given society may be intertwined with the religious institutions in complicated ways.
Especially here in the North, you have countries that are Lutheran through and through, you have national cults headed by the government and the Churches have a lot of social influence. But also because of the doctrine of the two regiments, people know that there's a time and place for religion and another where it isn't needed or wanted. It's sort like a 'don't call us, we'll call you' arrangement. Or, in more biblical terms... religion exists for people (when they need it; weddings, funerals, disasters), not people for religion.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-12 07:13 am (UTC)Also, hi. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-04-14 02:44 am (UTC)And Hi! Haven't heard from you in ages, how goes stuff? I think the last thing I saw was that you got the job you were looking at... is that still going well?
no subject
Date: 2008-04-17 02:20 am (UTC)during the effing DAILY SHOW.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-17 03:50 pm (UTC)I still might write the letter, though. The thought of them indirectly supporting Intelligent Design just makes my skin crawl.