quick update, Twilight question
Aug. 30th, 2008 02:04 pmWhy did no one tell me that the Twilight books are set in Washington State? I've been reading
cleolinda's summaries, and... Forks? I've been there. Well, driven through it. Which is all you need, I suspect, since it seems to consist entirely of a gas station, a deli/movie-rental-place and a really disgusting-looking motel. And when Bella apparently says she's "going to Seattle for the day"? Um. How, exactly? Forks = not really at all close to Seattle. Am I completely misunderstanding all of this via the magic of only reading summaries, or did SMeyers just completely screw over my state's geography?
I should be writing. But... meh. I so totally don't feel like it at the moment.
I should be writing. But... meh. I so totally don't feel like it at the moment.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 09:18 pm (UTC)Yeah.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 09:26 pm (UTC)That said, it would probably be an interesting setting for a book if, you know... the writer actually bothered to go there first. I mean... shit, did she have anything about it except the name and the fact that it's in Washington State? I'm not saying a writer has to go someplace before writing a location, but a little research would not at all be amiss!
no subject
Date: 2008-08-31 08:15 pm (UTC)While I'll agree that Stephenie Meyer is being a total prima-donna brat over the leaking of Midnight Sun, and that the books are more cotton-candy than great literature, and that while I like the relationship between Bella and Edward as something interesting to read about, engagingly fucked-up, it's really rather disturbing that SMeyer apparently set out to write Edward as the perfect man (for one thing, um, the perfect man is perpetually 17?!?) . . . I think it bears remembering that she originally wrote this for her own amusement and apparently only even attempted publication on her sister's urging. The books are flawed, in ways large and small, but she really had no idea what they were going to turn into. Doesn't absolve her of responsibility, but it does, for me, at least, inspire a little sympathy.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 03:51 pm (UTC)That's exactly it - goodness knows I've read all sorts of weird books with messed up relationships, and I love cotton candy literature if I'm in the right mood. What bothers me is that she seems to think of this guy as perfect (and portray him as such to her audience). When, in fact, as near as I can tell from reviews and summaries and quotes, he's pretty much a creepy stalker.
I guess what it comes down to is that I understand writing something just for fun, I understand that having it published would make things really weird, but I really don't like a lot of teenage girls looking at this thing as an example of relationships. That worries me a lot.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-31 02:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-31 04:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-31 08:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 03:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 05:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 03:45 pm (UTC)I never thought growing up with Mormon friends would lead to so many weird little random happenstances...
no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 11:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 03:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 07:13 pm (UTC)