bi!

May. 8th, 2011 02:07 pm
rivendellrose: (parasols)
Hey, look - it's a post that sums up, like, practically everything I've ever wanted to flail about regarding being bisexual. Just in case you were curious.

Because it's nice sometimes to have one's slightly non-standard viewpoint validated by a stranger. ♥
rivendellrose: (Daleks Procrastinate!!!)
In a recent post, [livejournal.com profile] vonquixote commented on media that "constructs its gay couples as doomed, fraught relationships between people who are in some way wrong (which Torchwood has done frequently throughout its run) and presents its straight couples* as the human side that reminds everyone what they're fighting for." (Original post is here.)

In a word - YES. This is what I've been struggling for so long to find a way of commenting on, in regards to RTD's writing on Doctor Who and Torchwood. And it leads me to another situation that's been driving me crazy for about a year and half, now - ever since I suddenly noticed that somehow every time RTD has a gay couple on one of his shows... something goes terribly, terribly wrong. Specifically with one or both parties of the couple. One of them is abusive (DW, "Midnight") or crazy manipulative (TW, that one with Tosh's alien 'girlfriend'), or... well, it would take too long to describe everything that's wrong with Jack and Ianto's relationship, as much as I love both of them.

This entry contains, but does not center around, spoilers for Torchwood 'Children of Earth' )

Thoughts, comments, thwacks upside the head?
rivendellrose: (Attention Plz)
Question: I cannot possibly be the only hetero- or bisexual girl in the world who doesn't find Zach Quinto attractive, can I?

Insert obligatory "not that there's anything wrong with that" clause here. I just don't, and it bemuses me because... well, because he's kind of got My Type written all over him, and yet I am so unmoved.

So... stand up and be counted, ye other 'nope, not seeing it!' people... because I'm feeling very alone in this right now, and slightly afraid that if I keep up with this whole 'sucked back into the old fandom' thing, I may just develop some sort of... backhanded attraction-by-association thing. o_O Sort of like how the more you watch Doctor Who, the more likely you are to eventually find yourself completely un-bothered by the idea of any of the Doctors? And to even sort of find all of them attractive? Or maybe that's just me... There but for the grace of 'dear god, no' go I, I suppose, anyway.

Anyway. Humor me, people. I'm feeling sullied and unusual exhausted and crummy from a messy day at work and a nasty bout of hormones.
rivendellrose: (Lucy Saxon - so you say...)
Headline on NPR.org: Study says Tolerance Can Lower Gay Kids' Suicide Risk.

In other news, rain is wet, fire is hot, and grass tends, when watered appropriately, to be green.

Brainlessly obvious excerpt: A new study suggests that parental acceptance, and even neutrality, with regard to a child's sexual orientation could have a big impact in reducing this rate.

Honestly. In what twisted, idiotic world can we actually call this news? Newsflash: If you tell your kids they're going to hell and throw them out of the house and things like that, they might kill themselves. If you can't figure this out on your own, you officially fail at not only parenthood but, in fact, sentient living. Please go back to the wet little pond of bacteria and start over from square one, dumb-asses. (For the record, I'm not really mad at NPR over this - I'm mad that they actually have to say it, because people are still such idiots that they won't accept their kids over something so gods-fucking-damned trivial.)

In news that annoys me only slightly less than NPR apparently feeling like they need to treat this study like some kind of flipping breakthrough, the guy sitting behind me at the library just farted. This is how I'm spending the extra hour I got by getting a ride home from work, everybody. Isn't life grand? :P
rivendellrose: (Politics!)
Mayor Sanders of San Diego currently has my vote for most awesome living politician in the United States. I don't know anything else about him or his politics, but unless he's a truly Oscar-calibre actor, he did some real soul searching and eventually came to the conclusion that I wish more politicians would: That all relationships, regardless of the sex of the two people involved, deserve the chance to be equally recognized.

Big applause, sir. I wish all the politicians in this country had as much heart.
rivendellrose: (Default)
A (online) fortune cookie last night told me to spend more time with my imaginary friends. Considering how much of my life is spent carrying around various characters and prepping/plotting/working on fic... I really do sort of wonder whether I'm not perhaps spending enough time with them already. o_O

But, since I consider it wise to take advice from baked goods, I see from [livejournal.com profile] theladyfeylene that there is a meme going around to list the twelve fictional characters that one would happily sleep with. Sort of like a twelve days of Christmas, only... smuttier. Yes, I just said smuttier, and I'm aware that's improper English. But I'm tired and feeling random. So there. :P

The meme seems to involve posting pictures. I don't feel that organized at the moment, but if you don't know who someone is and you're curious to see them, let me know and I'll see if I can oblige.

This will probably not surprise anyone who's known me very long, but I'll try to make it entertaining nonetheless. )
rivendellrose: (ivanova)
So... once again, bisexuals don't exist. Normally I would disagree vehemently with this statement, but at the moment I'm too busy wondering whether this qualifies as good reason to quit going to work and refuse to pay rent, bills, and my college debt. Since, you know, if I don't exist... I clearly can neither work nor owe anyone money.

Unfortunately, I'm pretty sure they mean that bisexuality doesn't exist, which means that I just cycle quickly back and forth between straight and gay depending on who/what I'm looking at. It's like a magic trick! Hold up a picture of Johnny Depp, and I'm straight. Hold up a picture of Gina Torres, and I'm gay! Straight, gay, straight, gay.... And no picture equals asexual! Tada! *Bows, waits for applause*

...Shut up, it was a long week. And we had wine at the end of the work-day. :P

Anyway, considering that the internet is so rabidly determined to deny my sexuality, I've decided to make a change. Henceforth, I shall refer to myself as "Snarky Somewhat-Roguish Intellectual Geek, Willing to Spend Time Outdoors But Will Not Pressure Me Into Snowboarding, Preferably With Nice Accent But That's Not Strictly Necessary, However Must Like Cats"-sexual. Specific enough for you? Okay.

Oh, and that whole "all bisexual women end up straight" thing? Let's think about this. Theoretically, 10% of the population is gay. I think that discounts bisexuals, but we'll stick with the conservative figure for the sake of argument. Now, that percentage probably gets tweaked by where you live, so let's assume that the population of Seattle includes... 7% women who are attracted to other women. And about 43% men who are attracted to women. By this logic, my chances of settling down with a guy are... what, about nine times better than settling down with a woman... despite the fact that, at the moment, I feel more attracted to women. This is particularly true since I think a lot of bisexuals (umm... I'm just guessing, from my own experience and watching othes) are either not that involved in the gay scene or just sort of... find the same sex attractive but prefer to stick with dating the opposite because it's easier from a societal perspective. It's the norm. People tend to follow norms, whether consciously or not.

And lastly? Even if I were to settle down and (gasp!) marry a nice guy - even if I was pleased as punch to be with that guy and had no interest in zipping off for an affair or whatever - I'd still be bisexual. Unless I just kind of... woke up one day and found women sexually repugnant (not likely, I'm thinking), that's just plain not apt to change. So pppphhhhbbbbbbbbt to society. :P

This rant brought to you by Fandom_Wank, Friday Wine Tastings at Office, and the letters THANK GOD IT'S FRIDAY.

I need a bisexuality icon. Ivanova will have to suffice for now.

gay rights

Oct. 2nd, 2006 08:01 pm
rivendellrose: (scully red)
Gacked from the ever-wise [livejournal.com profile] ellid:

"Why is it that, as a culture, we are more comfortable seeing two men holding guns than holding hands?" - Ernest Gaines

Why indeed.
This culture is fucked up. We need an overhaul, ASAP.


Update: In response to a few comments I've heard from people, I've removed the second paragraph from this meme. I would think that people would be used enough to memes getting fluttered around LJ that there would be a tacit assumption that no, I/we/people-in-general don't assume that you're a homophobe just because you didn't c/p a little statement.

On this subject, after taking the rent over to our landlord today, two of my housemates were passed by a moron guy in a car who yelled "LESBOS!" out the window at them. As we said "...and your point would be?"
rivendellrose: (Default)
Very eloquent and intelligent discussion of Blog Against Racism Week over at [livejournal.com profile] misia's journal. I'll let that list speak for itself in terms of my participation, because I really don't feel qualified to discuss the subject much, myself. I grew up white in suburbia. I'm working all that entails, and I figure that's the best I can do at the moment. Avoiding speaking for others, in a situation like this, seems like a virtue.

I will say, however, that point number three on the above link is something that has occasionally driven me to distraction. I understand curiosity (oh, do I ever), but I, personally, am very leery of asking questions that might be misunderstood as being too personal, too prying, hitting too close to things people don't want to talk about. I'll generally do a lot just to avoid asking questions directly, particularly about touchy issues like religion. On the other hand, I'm aware that assumption and silence is how people develop false assumptions. I'm always glad to speak about my personal experiences and impressions as a student, as a pagan, as a bisexual... what-have-you. It's the big questions ("What do pagans believe?") that throw me. I can answer "what's paganism" pretty well, especially from a historical perspective, but as for what we believe... ask a dozen pagans, get a dozen answers. And they're likely to disagree fairly strongly with each other on everything but the veeeeeery basics. And in my experience, that's the case with any group, particularly a group that's usually a minority. What feminists think, what Asian-Americans think, what Jews think, what Bostonians, Seattleites, Austin... umm.... Austonians?

Anyway, you get the point. But for the record, if anybody actually wants to know my opinion (gasp) on something that I actually have experience with, you all know that I'm talkative as all hell, and the only thing that holds me back from lecturing every time a holiday rolls around is that I really doubt you all want me on pontification-mode eight times a year. ;) I can only speak for myself, but I cherish the chance to begin a dialogue and keep things (especially matters like religion and sexuality, those controversial things that I feel that I can speak to some degree on) out in the open.

Profile

rivendellrose: (Default)
rivendellrose

August 2024

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526 2728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 23rd, 2025 09:34 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios